Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Oncol. 2012 Mar 30;51(6):781–789. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.653009

Table V.

Association between Bcl-2 and DFS in the Danish Cohort of BIG 1 - 98 by multivariable analysis.a

Risk factor p-value Level n Periodb HR (95% CI)
Bcl-2 0.004 0–9% 37 2.11 (1.30–3.42)
10–49% 32 0.79 (0.41–1.53)
≥ 50%/weak-mod 234 0–5 years 1.20 (0.89–1.63)
5–10 years 0.44 (0.21–0.93)
≥ 50%/strong 888 1.00 (reference)
ER 0.82 1–79% 207 1.03 (0.78–1.38)
80–100% 984 1.00 (reference)
Tumor grade 0.004 Not known 159 1.22 (0.70–2.12)
Grade I 249 0.72 (0.52–1.00)
Grade II 619 1.00 (reference)
Grade III 164 1.47 (1.09–2.00)
Positive lymph nodes 0.0001 0 416 0.70 (0.53–0.93)
1–3 516 1.00 (reference)
4 + 166 1.13 (0.82–1.57)
10 + 93 3.05 (2.18–4.27)
Histological type 0.25 Ductal 999 1.00 (reference)
Non-ductal 192 0.73 (0.43–1.24)
Tumor size 0.001 1–20 mm 568 0.69 (0.54–0.89)
21–50 mm 585 1.00 (reference)
≥ 51 mm 38 1.62 (1.01–2.61)
HER-2 0.034 normal 1082 1.00 (reference)
amplified 109 1.47 (1.03–2.06)

CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio.

a

Model stratified by randomization option, allocated treatment and age at randomization.

b

Time-dependent variables. If nothing is mentioned the follow-up period is from 0 years after randomization.