Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2012 Sep 27;32(7):1164–1190. doi: 10.1002/sim.5628

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Smoothed kernel density plots of MSE (row 1), AIC (row 2) and BIC (row 3) for data simulated based on a 5×5 contingency table under interactions of Type A (left column), Type D (middle column) and compositional epistasis (right column). These results correspond to the parametric configuration where β = log(2) = 0.6931 = δ (Type A and Type D interactions), β = 0 = δ (compositional epistasis), θ11 = 2 (Type A interaction and compositional epistasis), θ11 = −2 (Type D interaction), and ρ = 0.50. The smoothed kernel density estimates were obtained using the density function in the R programming language with the default settings for bandwidth. Under Type D interaction, the MSEs of the optimal additive GJ model and the additive logistic model are similar. Hence, the two curves overlap. In order to distinguish the two colors (green and red), we have shown these two curves using dashed lines for ease of visualization.