Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Psychol. 2013 May 13;127(3):282–298. doi: 10.1037/a0031723

Table 5.

Everett test of the Robustness of the Six and Five Component Solutions

Six Component Solution PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 Congruence
Bucknell University 1.00 .98 .98 .96 .95 .98 .98
Living Links, USA .98 .97 .96 .96 .99 .48 .93
Georgia State University Language Research Center 1.00 1.00 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Living Links, Edinburgh Zoo 1.00 1.00 .99 .99 .98 .99 .99
National Institutes of Health 1.00 1.00 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yale University 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00
CNRS Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00
Five Component Solution
Bucknell University .99 .97 .94 .98 .95 --- .97
Living Links, USA .99 .99 .96 .95 .95 --- .97
Georgia State University Language Research Center 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .99 --- 1.00
Living Links, Edinburgh Zoo 1.00 .99 .99 .98 .98 --- .99
National Institutes of Health 1.00 1.00 .99 1.00 1.00 --- 1.00
Yale University 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --- 1.00
CNRS Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --- 1.00

Note. The site name in each row indicates the site that was left out to generate the loading matrix. The target matrix was either the six or five component varimax-rotated structure based on data from all sites. Components that did not replicate are indicated in boldface. PC = Principal component.