Table 2.
Nulliparous women | Parous women | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | HRs (95% CIs)a | Cases | HRs (95% CIs)a,b | P heterogeneity c | |
Body mass index among never users of menopausal hormone therapy | |||||
<25 kg/m2 | 23 | 1.00 (Referent) | 86 | 1.00 (Referent) | |
25–<30 kg/m2 | 30 | 1.87 (1.09, 3.23) | 125 | 1.73 (1.31, 2.27) | |
≥30 kg/m2 | 80 | 5.59 (3.46, 9.01) | 315 | 5.48 (4.30, 7.00) | 0.96 |
Body mass index among current users of menopausal hormone therapy | |||||
<25 kg/m2 | 45 | 1.00 (Referent) | 200 | 1.00 (Referent) | |
25–<30 kg/m2 | 32 | 1.36 (0.86, 2.14) | 113 | 1.00 (0.79, 1.26) | |
≥30 kg/m2 | 24 | 1.72 (1.03, 2.89) | 67 | 1.25 (0.94, 1.65) | 0.39 |
HRs: Hazard Ratios; 95% Confidence Intervals; Separate models fit to nulliparous and parous women. Models adjusted for age at menarche, age at menopause, oral contraceptive use as well as birth year, study, calendar year of entry, diabetes, and smoking status.
Further adjusted for number of births.
P-value for the heterogeneity between parous and nulliparous women based on a Wald type chi-square test.