Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 25;19(4):197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2011.06.003

Table 3.

Particulate delivery systems as vaccine adjuvant.

Adjuvant type Representing examples General description Mechanism of action Advantages Disadvantages
Particulate delivery vehicle ISCOM It contains a triterpenoid saponins obtained from Quillaia saponins, a sterol and optionally a phospholipid. The saponins are Quil A or QS-21
  • 1.

    Generate CTL response, induce cytokines

  • 2.

    Directly phagocytosed by macrophages

Induces strong immune response
  • 1.

    Severe pain at the site of injection

  • 2.

    Severe toxicity includes severe haemolysis, granulomas

Liposomes Contains synthetic phospholipids. Liposomes based hepatitis A vaccine approved in Europe Fuse with cell membrane of macrophages, enable antigen in to the cyto plasma, enter MHC class I path way and activate CD8 CTL response Induces strong immune response
  • 1.

    Manufacturing difficulties due to stability

  • 2.

    High cost

  • 3.

    Severe pain at the site of injections

Polymeric microparticle
  • 1.

    It is made by biodegradable polymers

  • 2.

    Antigens encapsulated inside the microparticles

  • 3.

    It is considered as next generation of adjuvants

  • 4.

    Potential for single shot vaccines

  • 1.

    Long term depot effect from weeks to months

  • 2.

    Pulsatile release of antigens

  • 3.

    Target to antigen presenting cells

  • 1.

    It can mimic the priming and boosting effect of conventional vaccine

  • 2.

    Potential for single shot vaccines and can reduces the cost of vaccination

  • 1.

    Issues on stability of antigens during micro encapsulation and storage

  • 2.

    Issues on dose optimization