Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 28;86(1028):20130115. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130115

Table 3.

Influence of z-axis coverage and reader on the probability of correct final diagnosis

Parameters Odds ratio p-value
Entire study group (n=152)a Set S vs set L 0.61 (0.42, 0.88) 0.008
Set M vs set L 0.94 (0.65, 1.38) 0.771
Reader A vs Reader B 1.34 (0.99, 1.81) 0.057
Patients with acute appendicitis (n=46) Set S vs set L 0.80 (0.31, 2.03) 0.635
Set M vs set L 0.89 (0.34, 2.31) 0.808
Reader A vs Reader B 0.54 (0.25, 1.19) 0.126
Patients without acute appendicitis (n=106)b Set S vs set L 0.57 (0.34, 0.87) 0.009
Set M vs set L 0.95 (0.62, 1.47) 0.824
Reader A vs Reader B 1.47 (1.04, 2.07) 0.029
a

Appendicitis, alternative disease and non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP).

b

Alternative disease and NSAP. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.