Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 4;128(3):1017–1072. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjt011

Table II.

Effects of Younger Twins, Women Aged 15–24, Pooled Data

(1) (2)
Parental coresidence Number of siblings
Panel A. Effect of a singleton sister relative to a singleton brother
First subsequent pregnancy (N = 105,992) −0.028 0.417
[0.003] [0.010]
Second subsequent pregnancy (N = 82,658) −0.015 0.355
[0.003] [0.011]
Panel B. Effect of twin sisters relative to a singleton sister
First subsequent pregnancy (N = 51,730) −0.020 0.831
[0.028] [0.097]
Second subsequent pregnancy (N = 39,977) −0.057 0.939
[0.029] [0.109]
Panel C. Effect of twin brothers relative to singleton brother
First subsequent pregnancy (N = 54,787) −0.003 0.843
[0.027] [0.098]
Second subsequent pregnancy (N = 43,115) 0.005 0.857
[0.028] [0.099]

Notes. OLS estimates. Brackets contain standard errors clustered at the PSU level. The sample includes young women whose mothers had at least one or two subsequent pregnancies, depending on the specification. Each cell reports a coefficient from a separate regression. All regressions include fixed effects for age, survey (country-by-year), and the exact composition of older siblings by birth order and sex. Regressions also control for spacing from the previous birth, maternal and paternal educational attainment, maternal age, religion, and rural residence.

Source. DHS Fertility Histories.