Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug;134(2):1598–1609. doi: 10.1121/1.4812881

TABLE II.

Comparison of lithotripter parameters calculated from experimental and numerical pressure profiles at the focus for the original lens design. Energy subscripts +1, 1, and +2 refer to the first compressive, first tensile, and second compressive wave, respectively. Rh=6 mm was used for all pulse energy calculations.

  Source voltage (kV) P+ (MPa) P (MPa) t+ (μs) t (μs) tr (ns)
Experimental 13.8 46.3 −10.2 1.62 3.49 145.0
  15.8 56.4 −11.0 1.59 3.31 16.2
Numerical 13.8 45.2 −8.9 1.57 3.40 50.2
  15.8 52.2 −10.6 1.63 3.69 37.3
  Source voltage (kV) Beam width (mm) E+1 (mJ) E1 (mJ) E+2 (mJ) Etotal (mJ)
Experimental 13.8 7.4 33.2 17.2 1.5 53.2
  15.8 7.5 51.7 18.3 4.3 74.7
Numerical 13.8 7.6 30.1 13.5 1.6 45.3
  15.8 8.3 48.0 20.3 2.8 71.5