Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 13;45(3):684–695. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0286-x

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Temporal performance of inter-PC communication. Top row: Distribution of the lag between sending a request from the presentation PC and receiving gaze position data from the recorder PC. Bottom row: Intervals between requests for current gaze position. The ideal interval was equal to the interframe interval of the LCD (16.67 ms, indicated by a vertical dashed line)