Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 29;2013:458253. doi: 10.1155/2013/458253

(b)  

Author, year Type of testing Type of histology Histological parameters analyzed μ-CT parameters analyzed Mechanical testing
Cao and Kuboyama, 2010 [46] μ-CT, bone mineral density (new bone quantity), histology, and biodegradation Decalcified histology Area of material in defect, new bone volume/total volume percent material biodegradation Bone reformation No

Chu et al., 2007 [72] Radiograph, μ-CT, and histology MMC histology New bone formation Callus and scaffold volumetric bone mineral density Four-point bending

Jegoux et al., 2008 [73] Polarized Light; μ-CT, SEM Glycol methacrylate Used thick histology sections for observation under poler Bioceramic, newly formed bone at the center, and superior and inferior quarter of the implant No

Guda et al., 2011 [74] Radiograph, μ-CT, histology MMC histology Mineralized bone, fibrous tissue Bone regeneration patterns, bone density, bone growth profiles, and overall bone volume Four-point bending

Ignatius et al., 2001 [75] Mechanical, histology Undecalcified histology New bone formation, new soft tissue formation, remaining implant components No Compression of 5 × 5 × 3 mm cubes

Jayabalan et al., 2010 [76] Histology Resin histology Foreign body giant cell, bone growth No No

Lickorish et al., 2007 [77] Histology Decalcified histology Fibrous tissue formation, bone ingrowth, foreign body reaction No No

Rai et al., 2010 [78] Radiograph, μ-CT, histology Decalcified histology Presence of fibroblasts, chondrocytes, woven bone New bone formation No

Xu et al., 2011 [25] Histology; radiography Decalcified histology Inflammatory reaction, new bone formation, scaffold resorption No No