Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul-Sep;4(3):198–203. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.114600

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The area at risk (AAR/LV wt., %, a) and myocardial infarct size (IS/AAR,%, b) in the control and experimental groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of 12 experiments. Significant difference: *P < 0.01 vs. control; #P < 0.05 vs. A12 and analogue I