Skip to main content
. 2013 May 15;38(10):1937–1944. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.89

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mean (±SEM) adjusted amounts (a), trials (b), and intake (c) during the 8 s delay, when both lithium and control mice were water deprived. Adjusted amounts continued to be significantly higher with lithium treatment, (*P<0.005), whereas trials completed and intake did not, demonstrating that the anti-impulsive effects of lithium were not secondary to its effects on thirst motivation during this task.