Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1943–1951. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.11.1943

TABLE 5. Effect of Facilitated Psychiatric Advance Directive on Perception of Whether Need for Mental Health Services Has Been Met at 1-Month Follow-Up (N=381).

Model 1a
Model 2b
Model 3c
Odds
Ratio
95% CI Odds
Ratio
95% CI Odds
Ratio
95% CI
Baseline perception of whether need for mental
 health services has been met 3.95 2.40–6.50*** 4.55 2.63–7.88*** 4.38 2.54–7.54***
 Control group (comparison) 1.00 1.00
 Intervention group 1.57 1.03–2.39* 1.42 0.89–2.27
Mediating variables
 Improvement in working alliance 1.67 1.24–2.26***
 Increase in outpatient service utilization 4.87 3.03–7.81*** 5.11 3.20–8.17***
Interaction of completion of psychiatric advance di-
 rective with working alliance
 Completed facilitated intervention, no improve-
 ment in working alliance (comparison)
1.00
 Completed facilitated intervention without im-
 provement in working alliance
1.14 0.64–2.04
 Improved working alliance without completing
 facilitated intervention
1.01 0.51–2.01
 Completed facilitated intervention with improved
 working alliance
2.47 1.24–4.87**
a

Model statistics: N observations=381; log likelihood: χ2=32.86, df=2, p<0.001; pseudo R2=0.07; Somer’s D=0.30.

b

Model statistics: N observations=381; log likelihood: χ2=109.18, df=4, p<0.001; pseudo R2=0.21; Somer’s D=0.59.

c

Model statistics: N observations=381; log likelihood: χ2=102.55, df=5, p<0.001; pseudo R2=0.20; Somer’s D=0.56.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001.