Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Early Adolesc. 2009 Jun 22;30(4):518–542. doi: 10.1177/0272431609338180

Table 3.

Parameter estimates for the full model testing the relationships between pubertal timing and delinquency: Total sample and multiple group models by gender and maltreatment group

Unstandardized estimates (SE)
Standardized estimates
Total sample Males Females Maltreatment Comparison Total sample Males Females Maltreatment Comparison
Full Model
 T1pubertal timing→T1delinquency .31 (.14) .43 (.20) .09 (.16) .34 (.17) .09 (.27) .13** .16* .04 .13 .03
 T1pubertal timing→T2delinquency −.25 (.16) −.25 (.18) −.80 (.69) −.25 (.24) −.18 (.18) −.13** −.11 −.56 −.12 −.11
 T1pubertal timing→T2pubertal timing .69 (.07) .53 (.09) .89 (.12) .80 (.09) .49 (.11) .67** .50** .90** .73** .49**
 T2pubertal timing→T2delinquency .47 (.15) .34 (.16) 1.07 (.71) .37 (.21) .70 (.20) .25** .16* .73 .20 .41**
 T1delinquency→T2delinquency .42 (.04) .52 (.06) .26 (.06) .42 (.05) .30 (.05) .53** .63** .34** .53** .51**

Note: all parameter estimates are from unconstrained model;

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

p<.10