Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Astronaut. 2012 Oct 5;92(1):79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.08.032

Table 4.

Relative correlation coefficients (R values) for QUS, μCT and mechanical testing. SCAN determined ultrasound parameters are able to predict structural and strength properties of trabecular bone. Combined BUA and UV indexes improve the correlation coefficients consistently above 0.75 with regard to the elastic modulus, bulk modulus, yield or ultimate strength. Strong correlations were also found between combined BUA & UV from single direction, i.e., ML, and structural and strength parameters, suggesting QUS signals extracted from particular direction (e.g., under in vivo condition) are able to predict overall trabecular bone density and stiffness.

ATT UV BUA Combo BUA & UV in ML Combo BUA & UV in AP Combo BUA & UV
AP Modulus −0.71 0.79 −0.31 0.74 0.74 0.80
p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.033 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

LG Modulus −0.75 0.79 −0.221 0.63 0.67 0.81
p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.131 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

ML Modulus −0.673 0.89 −0.483 0.79 0.74 0.78
p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

Bulk Modulus −0.75 0.82 −0.358 0.76 0.75 0.84
p<0.001 p<0.001 p=0.012 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

Yield Strength −0.72 0.90 −0.85 0.87 0.89 0.93
p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

Ulti. Strength −0.75 0.90 −0.85 0.87 0.88 0.94
p<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 p<0.001

BV/TV −0.37 0.93 −0.73 0.93 0.93 0.93
p=0.018 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001
BMD 0.74 0.85 −0.75 0.86 0.85 0.87

SMI 0.3 0.9 0.66 0.91 0.92 0.93
p=0.034 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

Conn.D. −0.12 −0.33 0.07 0.32 0.39 0.42
p=0.5 p=0.006 p=0.5 p=0.025 p=0.006 p=0.003

Tr.Th. −0.17 0.69 −0.34 0.83 0.64 0.67
p=0.368 p<0.001 p=0.01 p<0.001 p<0.001 p<0.001

DA −0.278 0.5 −0.32 0.34 0.44 0.50
p=0.056 p<0.001 p=0.26 p=0.17 p=0.002 p<0.001