Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2012 Aug;4(3):216–50. doi: 10.1257/pol.4.3.216

Table 10.

Characteristics in the Regression Sample

2009 Tax credit lower withholding 2008 Tax rebate 2009 Retiree payment 2009 Hypothetical payment
Percent mostly spend 13 22 30 23
Percent by form of delivery
    Lower withholding 100 0 0 0
    One-time payment 0 100 100 100
Percent by timing of survey response
    Contemporaneous 100 36 100 100
    Six months after receipt 0 32 0 0
    Twelve months after receipt 0 32 0 0
Percent hypothetical payment 0 0 0 100
Dollar value of stimulus (imputed annual)
    Mean 602 1,019 250 250
    Standard deviation 271 605 0 0
    Mean percent of annual income 1.2 2.4 1.0 0.5
Current finances compared to a year ago
    Better off 24 23 15 23
    Same 21 22 33 21
    Worse off 55 55 52 56
Expected income growth g
    g >= 4% 24 24 14 23
    4% > g > 0% 24 28 22 23
    g = 0% 23 25 33 24
    0% > g > –10% 18 16 24 18
    g <= –10% 12 8 7 13
State unemployment rate near time of receipt
    Mean (percent) 9.3 5.3 9.5 9.3
    Standard deviation 1.8 1.0 1.8 1.8
Married 68 62 51 64
Have children in household 42 36 7 43
Age of respondent (head or spouse)
    Under age 30 7 8 2 6
    Age 30 to 39 24 19 2 25
    Age 40 to 49 28 21 7 28
    Age 50 to 64 34 28 23 35
    Age 65 and over 8 24 65 5
    Did not report age 0 0 1 0
Household income
    Less than $20,000 8 14 31 9
    $20,001 to $35,000 12 17 21 11
    $35,001 to $50,000 14 15 14 13
    $50,001 to $75,000 21 19 11 19
    More than $75,000 43 29 14 44
    Did not report income 3 5 10 4
Household stock wealth
    None 25 34 53 27
    $1 to $15,000 17 14 9 15
    $15,001 to $50,000 16 13 5 16
    $50,001 to $100,000 12 10 8 10
    $100,001 to $250,000 12 10 7 12
    More than $250,000 8 7 8 10
    Did not report stock value 9 10 9 10
    Did not report if stockowner 1 2 2 1
Percent with interview in 2009 100 32 100 100
Observations 590 2,358 356 609

Notes: Authors’ weighted tabulations of the May and June 2008, November and December 2008, and May and July 2009 surveys. Variables with comparisons over “last year” or “next year” are also measured relative to the interview month—and not necessarily the month of stimulus receipt. The state unemployment rate for the 2008 rebates is measured at May 2008 and for the 2009 policies at May 2009. The telephone area codes at the time of the interview are used to determine state of residence.