Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2012 Aug;4(3):216–50. doi: 10.1257/pol.4.3.216

Table 5.

Age and the Response to Rebates and Change in Withholding

Frequencies
Age of respondent Percent of group (A) Spend (B) Save (C) Pay debt (D) No rebate (E) Percent spend (F) p-value (G)
Rebates: Interview May/June 2008
Under 30 8 9 14 51 3 12
30–39 18 25 43 97 12 15
40–49 23 29 48 110 31 16 0.002
50–64 28 44 61 128 31 19
65 and over 23 62 70 71 16 30
Rebates: Interview November/December 2008
Under 30 8 6 12 35 20 11
30–39 18 25 31 94 20 17
40–49 21 41 31 93 40 25 0.059
50–64 29 46 47 122 66 21
65 and over 24 49 59 80 45 26
Rebates: interview May/July 2009
Under 30 5 15 9 16 6 37
30–39 17 28 38 76 22 20
40–49 21 32 33 86 47 21 0.138
50–64 31 54 44 128 72 24
65 and over 26 58 61 73 51 30
Withholding: Interview May/July 2009
Under 30 5 6 13 24 2 14
30–39 17 20 44 83 17 14
40–49 21 14 53 103 30 8 0.270
50–64 31 27 70 111 83 13
65 and over 26 11 23 13 201 23

Notes: Authors’ weighted tabulations. Column A is percent of all respondents to the survey in each age group regardless of whether they receive the stimulus or not. Column F is percent of stimulus recipients who plan to mostly spend the additional income. A smaller fraction of respondents (household heads) are in the under 30 group between 2008 and 2009.