Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 16;112(5):919–926. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct147

Table 2.

Models assessing the influence of biotic and abiotic variables on the natural abundance of leaf δ15N (‰) and leaf nitrogen concentration (N, %) for the nine bromeliad morphospecies (n = 5 for all species)

Fixed effects Estimate ± s.e. t-value d.f. P AIC (full model)
Leaf δ15N 114·59 (121·24)
Intercept –1·268 ± 0·37 –3·419 41 0·0014
Slope
FPOM 0·563 ± 0·14 4·151 0·0002
PPR –0·239 ± 0·15 –1·621 0·113
Ants 0·962 ± 0·26 3·635 0·0008
Leaf N 113·78 (118·7)
Intercept –5·067 ± 1·14 –4·429 40 <0·0001
Slope
WV 0·473 ± 0·24 1·928 0·0614
Algae –0·51 ± 0·18 –2·826 0·0073
Ants 2·371 ± 0·53 4·513 <0·0001
Metabolism 2·024 ± 0·54 3·766 0·0005

Algae, algal abundance; Ant, presence of associated ants; FPOM, fine particulate organic matter (mL); metabolism, C3 vs. CAM photosynthetic pathway; PPR, number of predatory taxa/number of prey taxa; WV, water volume (mL).