Table 3.
| B | SE | df | p | OR | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −.24 | .12 | 1 | .04 | .79 | [.62, .99] |
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| African American (ref) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Latina | .27 | .97 | 1 | .78 | 1.31 | [.20, 8.67] |
| Other | −.14 | 1.04 | 1 | .89 | .87 | [.11, 6.68] |
| Relationship status | ||||||
| Single/dating/other (ref) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Married/committed | −.12 | .58 | 1 | .84 | .89 | [.29, 2.75] |
| Major | ||||||
| Health-related (ref) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Not health-related | −1.21 | .56 | 1 | .03 | .30 | [.10, .90] |
| Survey mode | ||||||
| In person (ref) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Remote | .50 | .67 | 1 | .45 | 1.66 | [.45, 6.11] |
| Perceived HPV severity | −.89 | .43 | 1 | .04 | .41 | [.18, .95] |
| Perceived HPV vaccine safety | 1.31 | .61 | 1 | .03 | 3.69 | [1.13, 12.09] |
| Perceived social approval | 1.36 | .67 | 1 | .04 | 3.90 | [1.05, 14.57] |
| Regular doctor | ||||||
| No (ref) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Yes | .57 | .68 | 1 | .40 | 1.77 | [.47, 6.69] |
a
Vaccine initiation was coded 1=yes, 0=no/don’t know.
b
Analyses were conducted with only those who had heard of the vaccine and who provided data on all variables in the model.