Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 13;9:1187–1192. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S50458

Table 1.

Comparison between children affected by MoA and typical children on the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory: Parent Version

MoA (N = 486) (%) Controls (N = 518) (%) Chi-square value P-value
NS high levels 37.45 43.05 3.041 0.081
HA high levels 63.17 39.58 54.913 <0.001
RD high levels 42.59 47.68 3.400 0.065
P high levels 64.61 38.03 69.814 <0.001
SD high levels 46.30 53.67 5.159 0.023
C high levels 51.85 57.53 3.037 0.081
ST high levels 54.32 52.70 0.203 0.652

Notes:Table 1 shows the differences in prevalence of high levels in the domains of the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory: Parent Version questionnaire between children affected by MoA and typical developing children (controls). Specifically, according to Cloninger’s model, four temperament dimensions (NS, HA, RD, and P) and three higher order character dispositions (SD, C, and ST) were considered. P-values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Abbreviations: C, cooperativeness; HA, harm avoidance; MoA, migraine without aura; NS, novelty seeking; P, persistence; RD, reward dependence; SD, self-directedness; ST, self-transcendence.