Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 10;89(1):78–92. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0719

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(Left) The main canonical variates explaining differences between wMel and uninfected Aedes aegypti females at two different nutrition conditions (CV1, 77.3%; CV2, 15.3%). Non-overlapping error bars do not imply significant difference; (top right) shape change from uninfected to wMel infected; (bottom right) shape change from high nutrition to deprived nutrition. All shape changes were magnified 5×.