Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 10;89(1):78–92. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0719

Table 2.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Procrustes ANOVA comparing wing size and shape between field samples and between 2011 field and laboratory samples

Effect MS Df F P
2010 and 2011 field samples
Size Sample 0.040 1 0.59 0.444
Residual 0.067 214
Shape Sample 0.419* 26 8.30 < 0.001
(Procrustes) Residual 0.051* 5,564
2011 field and laboratory samples
Size Sample 2.794 3 73.23 < 0.001
Residual 0.038 224
Shape Sample 0.386* 78 9.48 < 0.001
(Procrustes) Residual 0.041* 5,824
*

Actual value is the number stated multiplied by 10−3.