Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 10;89(1):78–92. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0719

Table 5.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of wing size and Procrustes ANOVA of wing shape of captured third week of release, two weeks post release and two months post release (May) compared with field cage-reared and field mosquitoes from 2011

Effect MS df F P
Third week of release wMel captured vs. field cage Size Origin 0.051 1 3.63 0.060
Residual 0.014 75
Shape Individual 0.127* 26 3.50 < 0.001
Residual 0.036* 1,950
wMel captured vs. field 2011 Size Individual 3.437 1 60.28 < 0.001
Residual 0.057 134
Shape Individual 0.093* 26 2.43 < 0.001
Residual 0.038* 3,484
2 weeks post-release wMel captured vs. field cage Size Individual 2.371 1 44.41 < 0.001
Residual 0.053 92
Shape Individual 0.187* 26 5.56 < 0.001
Residual 0.034* 2,392
wMel captured vs. field 2011 Size Individual 0.291 1 3.82 0.053
Residual 0.076 151
Shape Individual 0.099* 26 3.73 < 0.001
Residual 0.036* 3926
May wMel captured vs. field cage Size Individual 1.905 1 33.71 < 0.001
Residual 0.057 82
Shape Individual 0.534* 26 14.42 < 0.001
Residual 0.037* 2,132
wMel captured vs. field 2011 Size Individual 0.368 1 4.62 0.033
Residual 0.080 141
Shape Individual 0.112* 26 2.90 < 0.001
Residual 0.038* 3,666
*

Actual value is the number stated multiplied by 10−3.