Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e72611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072611

Table 3. The impact of extrinsic or intrinsic host factors associated with supershedding in avian-virus systems for which data were available (test statistics are shown for the whole model, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, (CI) are shown only for selected factors (statistically significant factors are shown in bold text)).

Avian – Virus System Extrinsic Factor Intrinsic Factor Interaction n χ2 P Value Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Chicken – WNV CORT Sex CORT×Sex 37 17.33 0.001 320610 (NE)
Kestrel – AIV (oral) Virus Dose Sex Dose×Sex 16 2.02 0.568
Kestrel – AIV (cloacal) Virus Dose Sex Dose×Sex 16 3.34 0.342
Dunlin – AIV (cloacal) Virus Dose 20 0.115 0.735
Dunlin – AIV (oral) Virus Dose 17 0.267 0.606
Catbird – EEEV Sex 59 0.002 0.963
Catbird – WNV Sex 59 0.429 0.513
Catbird – WNV Migratory 17 0.018 0.893
Cardinal – WNV CORT Sex CORT×Sex 19 0.046 0.997
Mallard – AIV Food* Sex Food×Sex 40 4.87 0.181 4.38 (0.85–33.25)
Starling – AIV Sex 36 1.789 0.181
HOSP – AIV Age, Sex 36 0.702 0.704

Notes:

*

, Normally fed versus food-restricted mallards (10 & 20% body condition reduction, [31], χ2 = 3.12, df = 1, P = 0.077.

, House sparrow.

, Not estimable because the denominator was zero (i.e., no control treated birds were supershedders).