Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e71154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071154

Table 3. The percentage of HITs correctly classified by the majority (>50%) of KW’s, with range of percentage of correct “votes” for each image category in brackets.

Trial 1 0.03c 0.05c 0.03c_500_90% 0.03c_5000_99%
Normal (N = 30) 90%(25–95) 87%(30–90) 97%(50–100) 90%(30–90)
Mildly abnormal (N = 60) 58%(25–95) 83%(25–100) 63%(20–100) 80%(35–100)
Severely abnormal (N = 10) 100%(90–100) 100%(90–100) 100%(90–100) 100%(95–100)
Any abnormality (N = 70) 64%(25–100) 86%(25–100) 69%(20–100) 83%(35–100)
Trial 2 0.03c 0.05c 0.03c_500_90% 0.03c_5000_99%
Normal (N = 30) 97%(50–100) 97%(40–100) 97%(45–100) 50%(30–75)
Mildly abnormal (N = 60) 68%(10–100) 85%(20–100) 70%(15–100) 96%(45–100)
Severely abnormal (N = 10) 100%(95–100) 100%(95–100) 100%(95–100) 100%(95–100)
Any abnormality (N = 70) 80%(10–100) 87%(20–100) 74%(15–100) 97%(45–100)