Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;74(5):674–683. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.674

Table 2.

Correlations between study variables

Variables 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Boys
 1. Paternal alcohol status –
 2. Paternal antisocial behavior .371** –
 3. Stroop interference 4th .153 .000 –
 4. Stroop interference 6th .437*** -.089 .419** –
 5. TOL standard score 4th .017 .053 .164 .120 –
 6. TOL standard score 6th -.220 -.050 .206 -.007 .140 –
 7. SSRT 4th -.060 -.157 -.185 -.010 -.177 -.099 –
 8. SSRT 6th -.169 -.005 .099 .045 -.042 .051 .058
Girls
 1. Paternal alcohol status –
 2. Paternal antisocial behavior .423*** –
 3. Stroop interference 4th -.189 -.125 –
 4. Stroop interference 6th -.208 -.097 .450** –
 5. TOL standard score 4th -.017 -.143 -.018 .302* –
 6. TOL standard score 6th -.083 -.097 .149 .137 -.013 –
 7. SSRT 4th .209 .091 -.123 -.114 .123 -.102 –
 8. SSRT 6th .012 -.121 .013 .122 .134 .055 .284†

Notes: 4th = fourth grade; 6th = sixth grade; TOL = Tower of London task; SSRT = stop-signal reaction time task

†

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.