Table 2.
Comparision of responses in parabiotic partners of obese rats and mice.
Model of obesity | Representative leptin values for obese animal** (ng/ml) | Body fat | Lean body mass | Food intake/gut content* |
---|---|---|---|---|
VMH lesioned rat | 301 | Decreased | Decreased | Decreased 10–20% |
LH stimulated rat | Decreased | Decreased | Decreased 70% | |
Intubated overfed rat | Decreased | Not measured | Decreased 15–30% | |
Tubefed overfed rat | 242 | Decreased | Unchanged | Unchanged |
Male Zucker rat | 503 | Decreased | Decreased | Unchanged |
Female Zucker rat | 423 | Decreased | Decreased | Decreased 21% |
ob/ob partner of db/db mouse | 254 | Decreased | Unchanged | Decreased 75% |
Wild type partner of db/db mouse | 254 | Decreased | Decreased | Unchanged |
Leptin injected ob/ob mouse | Decreased | Unchanged | Decreased 75% |
The change in food intake is the only parameter that is quantified because changes in body composition are influenced by the duration of the study.
Gut content shows a high correlation with the amount of food consumed during the previous 24 hours (Harris, Zhou, Weigle, & Kuijper, 1997).
Leptin values are taken from published data on single animals of the same genotype as the obese parabiont.
Harris (unpublished data),