Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 22;7(8):e2389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002389

Figure 4. Equivalence of ITM compared to CRS by endemicity class.

Figure 4

The figure presents the difference in the proportion of times ITM correctly classified districts compared to CRS (over 1000 simulations) by endemicity class in relation to an assumed value (20%) representing an important programmatic difference. The blue square is the mean difference in proportions and the lines correspond to the difference in the 95% CI. The two methods are deemed equivalent when ITM correctly classifies districts differently to CRS no more than 20% of the time.