Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 22;7(8):e2389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002389

Figure 6. Range of true prevalence values with high risk of misclassification by CRS and ITM.

Figure 6

Range of values in which the risk of misclassifying a district using CRS and ITM sampling methodologies is greater or equal to 0.20 around the 10% and 30% thresholds, with the enrolment rate equal to 0.7.