Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 22;8(8):e73367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073367

Table 3. Pooled ORs with 95% CIs for the association between MNS16A and cancer risk by stratified analysis.

Category Genetic model ORs (95%CI) P a P for heterogeneity I2
Ethnicity Caucasian S vs. L 1.16 (1.06–1.26) 0.001 0.235 23.4%
(No. of study = 9) LS vs. LL 1.16 (1.05–1.28) 0.003 0.689 0.00%
SS vs. LL 1.33 (1.15–1.54) 0.000 0.383 6.20%
Dominant 1.19 (1.09–1.31) 0.000 0.696 0.00%
Recessive 1.23 (1.07–1.42) 0.003 0.322 13.5%
Asian S vs. L 1.08 (0.76–1.55) 0.658 0.002 80.0%
(No. of study = 4) LS vs. LL 1.10 (0.78–1.56) 0.591 0.005 76.3%
SS vs. LL 1.13 (0.54–2.35) 0.747 0.188 37.3%
Dominant 1.10 (0.76–1.57) 0.621 0.003 78.7%
Recessive 1.12 (0.53–2.33) 0.768 0.204 34.8%
Cancer type Cerebral Cancer S vs. L 1.19 (1.10–1.30) 0.000 0.503 0.00%
(No. of study = 5) LS vs. LL 1.17 (1.04–1.32) 0.008 0.708 0.00%
SS vs. LL 1.42 (1.19–1.70) 0.000 0.303 17.6%
Dominant 1.22 (1.09–1.37) 0.000 0.686 0.00%
Recessive 1.32 (1.11–1.56) 0.001 0.248 26.0%
Lung Cancer S vs. L 0.96 (0.62–1.49) 0.842 0.066 63.3%
(No. of study = 3) LS vs. LL 1.07 (0.84–1.37) 0.571 0.379 0.00%
SS vs. LL 1.14 (0.51–2.57) 0.744 0.180 41.7%
Dominant 1.07 (0.81–1.42) 0.627 0.315 13.4%
Recessive 1.23 (0.56–2.73) 0.609 0.229 32.2%
Breast Cancer S vs. L 1.31 (1.00–1.72) 0.046 0.214 35.2%
(No. of study = 2) LS vs. LL 1.52 (1.19–1.94) 0.001 0.914 0.00%
SS vs. LL 1.12 (0.64–1.99) 0.687 0.691 0.00%
Dominant 1.46 (1.16–1.84) 0.002 0.620 0.00%
Recessive 0.97 (0.57–1.66) 0.904 0.576 0.00%
a

P value was calculated by the Z test.