Table I.
Mean | SD | N | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 20.66 | 1.71 | ||
Race/Ethnicity | ||||
Black | 76 | 39.2 | ||
Hispanic | 34 | 17.5 | ||
White | 50 | 25.8 | ||
Other Race | 34 | 17.5 | ||
Educationa | ||||
Not completed HS | 10 | 5.2 | ||
Completed HS/GED | 183 | 94.8 | ||
Sexual Identityb | ||||
Gay | 163 | 84.5 | ||
Bisexual | 26 | 13.5 | ||
Heterosexual | 7 | 3.6 | ||
Transgenderc | 14 | 7.3 | ||
Relationship Status | ||||
Single | 133 | 68.6 | ||
In a Relationship | 61 | 31.4 | ||
Lifetime HIV Testing | ||||
Tested | 129 | 66.5 | ||
Number of tests | 4.14 | 3.58 | ||
Never Tested | 65 | 33.5 | ||
HIV Status | ||||
HIV+ | 15 | 7.7 | ||
HIV− | 114 | 58.8 | ||
HIV Unknown | 65 | 33.5 | ||
Serodiscordance | ||||
Serodiscordant URAI | 25 | 12.9% | ||
Self-Efficacyd | ||||
Regular Partnere | 11.59 | 6.20 | ||
Casual Partnerf | 12.41 | 5.97 | ||
Low SE w/Reg Partner, Low SE w/Cas Partner | 57 | 29.4 | ||
Low SE w/Reg Partner, High SE w/Cas Partner | 21 | 10.8 | ||
High SE w/Reg Partner, Low SE w/Cas Partner | 24 | 12.4 | ||
High SE w/Reg Partner, High SE w/Cas Partner | 73 | 37.6 | ||
Sexual Behavior (past 2 months)f | ||||
Total number of male partners | 1.72 | 2.26 | ||
URAI partners | 0.43 | 0.87 | ||
Engaged in URAI | 54 | 27.8 |
Notes. HRHC = High Self-Efficacy with Regular and Casual Partners; HRLC = High Self-Efficacy with Regular Partners and Low Self-Efficacy with Casual Partners; LRHC = Low Self-Efficacy with Regular Partners and High Self-Efficacy with Casual Partners; LRLC = Low Self-Efficacy with Regular and Casual Partners
One participant had missing data on education
One participant had missing data on sexual identity
Two participants had missing data on transgender identity
Higher scores reflect less confidence in negotiating safer sex
14 participants had missing/incomplete data on self-efficacy with regular partners
16 participants had missing/incomplete data on self-efficacy with casual partners
Variables presented in original metric for descriptive purposes. Given their skewed distributions, we used each variable’s log10 transformation in analysis