Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 22;13:353. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-353

Table 2.

Comparison of S-WET and S-DRY in identifying various HPV genotypes

HPV detected
Number of samples
Positive agreement*
  WET+ DRY+ WET+ DRY- WET- DRY+ WET- DRY-  
Subject level comparison
 
 
 
 
 
Any HPV
61
16
0
35
88.4%
HPV 16 and/or HPV 18
32
13
2
65
81.0%
Other HR-HPV 47 12 1 52 87.9%

Note: HPV prevalence analyzed on subject level: subjects infected with HR-HPV/ specific HR-HPV types compared with those not infected with HR-HPV/ specific HR-HPV types.

*The observed proportion positive agreement=2a/(N+(a2d)), where a=the number of samples that were positive for HPV in both the wet and dry samples, d=the number of samples that were negative for HPV in both the wet and dry samples and N=all samples tested for HPV.

S-DRY dry vaginal swabs used for self-sampling, S-WET vaginal swabs with wet transport medium used for self-sampling.