Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 4;8:164. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-164

Table 9.

Summary of differences between treatment plan and radiobiological parameters from the two algorithms for prostate treatment

  Parameters   AAA Mean sd PBC Mean sd p
PTV
 D2%(Gy)
  
 77.6
 1.6
 78.7
 1.6
 <0.001
 
 D95%(Gy)
  
 75.3
 1.6
 76.2
 1.5
 <0.001
 
 Dmean(Gy)
  
 76.5
 1.5
 77.4
 1.6
 <0.001
 
 II(%)
  
 3.2
 0.1
 3.2
 0.2
 0.416
 
 TCP(%)α/β 1.49
  
 81.9
 5.1
 83.9
 4.3
 <0.001
 
 TCP(%)α/β 10.0
  
 93.8
 6.5
 95.7
 5.0
 <0.001
Rectum
 D2%(Gy)
  
 74.3
 1.6
 77.0
 2.0
 <0.001
 
 D50%(Gy)
  
 41.7
 6.5
 40.7
 6.8
 <0.001
 
 D95%(Gy)
  
 21.1
 4.8
 18.6
 4.7
 <0.001
 
 Dmean(Gy)
  
 44.6
 6.2
 43.9
 6.6
 0.002
 
  
 LKB model
    
  
  
  
 
 NTCP (%)
 Ref.
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 Rancati et al. [62]
 3.3
 1.9
 3.9
 2.5
 0.005
 
  
 Rancati et al. [62]
 0.5
 0.6
 1.5
 2.0
 0.006
 
  
 Tucker et al. [45]
 9.2
 2.2
 11.5
 2.3
 <0.001
 
  
 Peeters et al. [63]
 3.1
 1.9
 4.1
 2.9
 <0.001
 
  
 Söhn et al. [47]
 4.5
 1.8
 6.4
 2.6
 <0.001
 
  
 Rancati et al. [46]
 9.1
 2.2
 11.1
 2.2
 <0.001
 
  
 Seriality model
    
  
  
  
 
  
 Rancati et al. [62]
 3.0
 1.8
 3.5
 2.4
 0.013
Femoral heads
 D2%(Gy)
  
 55.2
 3.6
 54.5
 3.8
 0.104
 
 D50%(Gy)
  
 44.6
 6.9
 43.6
 7.3
 <0.001
 
 D80%(Gy)
  
 26.1
 5.7
 25.1
 6.0
 <0.001
 
  
 LKB model
    
  
  
  
 
 NTCP(%)
 Ref.
  
  
  
  
  
    Emami et al. [39] / Burman et al. [23] 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 <0.001

Insignificant differences (p > 0.05) are in bold.