Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 7;13:187. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-187

Table 2.

Cytotoxicity and antiviral activity of CHLA and PUG against different virus infectionsa

Virus
Cell type
Compounds
CC50(μM)b
Antiviral effect
        EC50(μM)c SId
HCMV
HEL
CHLA
306.32 ± 7.00
25.50 ± 1.51
12.01
 
 
PUG
299.32 ± 9.14
16.76 ± 0.88
17.86
HCV
Huh-7.5
CHLA
237.61 ± 4.53
12.16 ± 2.56
19.54
 
 
PUG
222.61 ± 3.41
16.72 ± 2.55
13.31
DENV-2
Vero
CHLA
159.63 ± 7.46
13.11 ± 0.72
12.18
 
 
PUG
151.44 ± 9.31
7.86 ± 0.40
19.27
MV
CHO-SLAM
CHLA
351.83 ± 4.54
34.42 ± 4.35
10.22
 
 
PUG
283.76 ± 11.54
25.49 ± 2.94
11.13
RSV
HEp-2
CHLA
244.17 ± 17.40
0.38 ± 0.05
642.55
 
 
PUG
264.83 ± 23.72
0.54 ± 0.04
490.43
VSV
A549
CHLA
316.87 ± 9.01
61.28 ± 5.50
5.17
 
 
PUG
318.84 ± 4.99
36.98 ± 4.59
8.62
ADV-5
A549
CHLA
316.87 ± 9.01
198.14 ± 14.07
1.60
    PUG 318.84 ± 4.99 196.67 ± 20.05 1.62

a Values shown are means obtained from three independent experiments with each treatment performed in triplicate.

b Cytotoxic effects were evaluated by XTT assay to determine the concentration of 50% cellular cytotoxicity (CC50) of the tested compounds.

c Antiviral effects were evaluated by infection analysis to determine the effective concentration that achieved 50% inhibition (EC50) against the specific virus examined.

d SI, selectivity index. SI = CC50/EC50.