Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 9;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-83

Table 5.

Verification of the interaction of GSTO SNPs (recessive model) with different types of ETS exposure on FEV1 in sample 2

  FEV1 (ml) b (95% CI)  
Gene
Variable
In utero ETS
Daily ETS
Workplace ETS
 
N, in analysis
3914
4527
4702
GSTO1
ETS
−45 (−91 ; 1)
41 (−78 ; -4)*
−40 (−98 ; 18)
 
rs4925
11 (−43 ; 65)
15 (−36 ; 66)
33 (−17 ; 83)
 
ETS*rs4925
111 (−32 ; 253)
25 (−93 ; 142)
−163 (−390 ; 65)
GSTO1
ETS
49 (−96 ; -1)*
40 (−78 ; -2)*
−40 (−100 ; 20)
 
rs1147611
4 (−40 ; 47)
21 (−21 ; 63)
26 (−15 ; 67)
 
ETS*rs1147611
94 (−22 ; 211)
5 (−89 ; 98)
−87 (−254 ; 81)
GSTO2
ETS
52 (−99 ; -5)*
41 (−79 ; -4)*
−38 (−98 ; 21)
 
rs156697
2 (−42 ; 46)
17 (−25 ; 59)
28 (−13 ; 69)
 
ETS*rs156697
119 (0 ; 237)*
17 (−79 ; 113)
−99 (−269 ; 70)
GSTO2
ETS
−46 (−92 ; 1)
40 (−78 ; -3)*
−42 (−101 ; 17)
 
rs156699
−9 (−58 ; 39)
0 (−46 ; 47)
10 (−35 ; 56)
  ETS*rs156699 106 (−29 ; 241) 9 (−97 ; 115) −101 (−292 ; 91)

Effects for in utero ETS exposure (no/yes), daily ETS exposure (</≥1 hr), workplace ETS exposure (no/yes), the SNPs, and the interaction of GSTO SNPs (recessive model) with different types of ETS exposure on FEV1 in sample 2 (verification). The linear regression model for the whole group was adjusted for sex, age, height, weight, current, ex-smoking and packyears smoked.

*p-value<0.05.