Table 5.
The summary of optimized input variables and obtained maximized photodegradation% by canonical, graphical, numerical methods and validation value of the photodegradation
| Method | Bi2O3 (%mol) | TiO2 (%mol) | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical (point) |
1.195 |
1.025 |
15.03 |
| Graphical (area) |
Area around 1.25 |
Area around 1.25 |
20.03 |
| Numerical (prediction) |
1.24 |
1.27 |
20.03 |
| Validated sample | 1.24 | 1.27 | 21.6 |