Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 May 16;132(3):681–687. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.022

Table 4.

Descriptive and comparative results for maintainers and decliners.

Maintainers (n = 69) Decliners (n = 22) t df p

M (SD) M (SD)
Age 44.62 (11.04) 45.95 (11.82) −0.48 89 .63
Years in clinical work 9.13 (8.04) 11.50 (9.09) −1.17 89 .25
Years in alcohol / drug 7.67 (6.92) 9.95 (8.47) −1.28 89 .21
Years education 17.28 (2.57) 17.41 (2.86) −0.20 88 .84
Years held highest degree* 8.89 (8.14) 12.00 (11.02) −1.22 29.14 .23
Years in recovery 4.77 (7.49) 9.20 (9.56) −2.16 83 .03
Hours previous MI training Allegiance to 1.07 (3.05) 0.45 (1.74) 0.90 88 .37
 MI 2.43 (1.08) 1.62 (0.87) 3.12 87 .00
 CBT 4.09 (0.84) 3.55 (0.96) 2.55 89 .01
 12step / disease concept* 3.62 (1.00) 3.68 (0.78) −0.29 45.04 .77

N (%) N (%) χ 2 df p

Female 44 (64) 15 (68%) 0.14 1 .80
Ethnicity 0.37 2 .83
 Caucasian 57 (83) 18 (82) - - -
 African-American 7 (10) 3 (14) - - -
 Hispanic or other 5 (7) 1 (5) - - -
In recovery 20 (31) 12 (60) 5.57 1 .03
Masters or Doctoral degree 42 (61) 12 (55) 0.28 1 .63
Community Treatment Program - - 12.68 11 .32
Training condition - 0.29 2 .87
Completed study 58 (84) 17 (77) 0.53 1 .52

Note.

*

equal variances not assumed. Treatment allegiance rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = very much). Percent within maintainers or percent within decliners is reported.