Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Pathol. 2013 May 7;44(9):1882–1889. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.02.016

Table 1.

Associations of CD44s expression with clinicopathologic factors

Characteristic CD44s expression
Pa
Total no. of
patients
Negative
(%)
Positive
(%)
Histologic type .039
  High-grade serous carcinoma 376 231 (61) 145 (39)
  Low-grade serous carcinoma 17 15 (88) 2 (12)
  Endometrioid adenocarcinoma 35 24 (69) 11 (31)
  Clear cell carcinoma 16 10 (63) 6 (37)
  Transitional cell carcinoma 11 3 (27) 8 (73)
  Other b 28 16 (57) 12 (43)
FIGO stage < .001
  I–II 51 45 (88) 6 (12)
  III–IV 432 254 (59) 178 (41)
Grade .013
  Low 26 22 (85) 4 (15)
  High 457 277 (61) 180 (39)
Ascites status .097
  No 54 39 (72) 15 (28)
  Yes 338 201 (60) 137 (40)
  Unknown 91 59 (65) 32 (35)
Response to clinical treatment .059
  No 59 30 (51) 29 (49)
  Yes 386 249 (65) 137 (35)
  Unknown 38 20 (53) 18 (47)
Age at diagnosis .011
  <60 years 242 136 (56) 106 (44)
  ≥60 years 241 163 (68) 78 (32)
Serum CA125 level .378
  <500 U/ml 138 86 (62) 52 (38)
  ≥500 U/ml 222 127 (57) 95 (43)
  Unknown 123 86 (70) 37 (30)
a

Fisher’s exact test.

b

mucinous adenocarcinoma (five cases), malignant mixed müllerian tumor (ten cases), undifferentiated carcinoma (ten cases), and mixed type carcinoma (three cases).