Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jul 23;36(10):1767–1778. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01786.x

Table 3.

Impact of SPARC on High-risk Drinking, Alcohol-related Consequences, and Alcohol-related Injuries: Results from 2003–2006 CDS1

Internal Consistency2 Least-Squares Means (SE) Random coefficient
model Results
2003 (Baseline) 2004 2005 2006
I C I C I C I C Estimate p-value
(SE)
Drinking
Past 30 day use (# days) N/A 4.11
(.34)
4.73
(.34)
4.18
(.38)
4.81
(.38)
4.25
(.31)
4.88
(.31)
4.33
(.39)
4.96
(.39)
−0.01
(.16)
0.98
Binge Drinking (# days in past 30 consumed 5 [for males] or 4 [for females] drinks in a row) N/A 2.35
(.24)
2.73
(.24)
2.37
(.26)
2.73
(.26)
2.39
(.24)
2.73
(.24)
2.41
(.27)
2.73
(.27)
0.02
(.10)
0.83
Drunk (# days/ typical week) N/A 0.55
(.06)
0.66
(.06)
0.57
(.07)
0.66
(.07)
0.58
(.06)
0.66
(.06)
0.60
(.07)
0.65
(.07)
0.02
(.02)
0.25
Most # drinks (past 30 days) N/A 4.39
(.27)
4.84
(.27)
4.40
(.28)
4.76
(.28)
4.40
(.28)
4.67
(.28)
4.40
(.26)
4.58
(.26)
0.09
(.08)
0.27
Consequences
Moderate Consequences, due
to own drinking (Tier I)
α = 0.86 7.78
(.60)
8.72
(.60)
8.05
(.64)
8.87
(.65)
8.33
(.56)
9.03
(.56)
8.60
(.65)
9.19
(.65)
0.12
(.26)
0.65
Severe Consequences, due
to own drinking (Tier II)
(%1+)
α = 0.79 0.18
(.01)
0.18
(.01)
0.17
(.02)
0.18
(.02)
0.17
(.01)
0.18
(.01)
0.16
(.02)
0.18
(.02)
−0.01
(.003)
0.02
Interpersonal Consequences, due to others’ drinking α = 0.81 1.34
(.12)
1.08
(.12)
1.23
(.13)
1.13
(.13)
1.18
(.11)
1.18
(.12)
1.11
(.13)
1.22
(.13)
−0.12
(.08)
0.16
Community Consequences, due to others’ drinking α = 0.75 5.38
(.38)
4.49
(.38)
5.14
(.39)
4.38
(.39)
4.90
(.38)
4.26
(.38)
4.66
(.39)
4.15
(.39)
−0.13
(.16)
0.41
Alcohol-related Injuries
Experienced (%1 +) αKR-20 = 0.93 0.12
(.01)
0.14
(.01)
0.11
(.01)
0.13
(.01)
0.12
(.01)
0.11
(.01)
0.11
(.01)
0.11
(.01)
0.01
(.004)
0.15
Caused to Others (%1+) αKR-20 = 0.98 0.04
(.003)
0.04
(.003)
0.03
(.004)
0.03
(.004)
0.02
(.003)
0.03
(.003)
0.02
(.004)
0.03
(.004)
−0.01
(.001)
0.03
1

Adjusted linear or logistic random coefficient mixed-effects models for CDS data, adjusted for within-school clustering, gender, race, and academic classification. Numbers given are the estimated least-squares means (population margins) or predicted probabilities; (standard error). Estimate (SE) and p-values in last column are from Type III test of condition x time interaction (I vs. C), where the null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the change of the outcome over time between I and C schools; A negative estimate indicates a declining trend over time in I schools compared to C schools.

2

Internal consistency measures are Cronbach’s alpha (α) or KR-20 (αKR-20), alpha for dichotomous items; N/A = internal consistency measures not available for a single survey item.