Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2012 Sep 24;77(19):8417–8427. doi: 10.1021/jo300971w

TABLE 1.

Screening of olefination conditions

graphic file with name nihms487771t1.jpg

entry basea solvent Additive T (°C); time (%) E/Z;b
yield (%)c
1d KHMDS THF -- −55; 10 min 82/18; 86
2d LHMDS THF -- −78; 10 min 88/12; 97
3d LHMDS THF MgBr2Et2Oe rt; 4 h 89/11; 78
4d LHMDS DMF DMPUf −78; 10 min 63/37; 74
5d LHMDS DMPU -- 0; 10 min 58/42; NAg
6h DBU CH2Cl2 -- rt; 10 min 69/31; 91
7h DBU CH2Cl2 -- 0; 10 min 70/30; 92
8h DBU CH2Cl2 -- −55; 10 min 74/26; 95
9h DBU CH2Cl2 -- −78; 10 min 74/26; NAg
10h DBU CH2Cl2 MgBr2Et2Oe rt; 30 h 60/40; Inci
11h DBU THF MgBr2Et2Oe rt; 30 h 90/10; Inci
12h Cs2CO3 CH2Cl2 -- rt; 6 h 74/26; NAg
a

KHMDS and LHMDS: 2.4 molar equiv. DBU: 4.0 molar equiv. Cs2CO3: 3.0 molar equiv.

b

E/Z ratio of diastereomers in the crude reaction mixture was determined by 19F NMR, prior to isolation.

c

Yields are of isolated and purified products.

d

Sulfone 3, 2.0 molar equiv.

e

3.0 molar equiv.

f

Cosolvent, ratio of DMF/DMPU 1:1 (v/v).

g

Products were not isolated.

h

Sulfone 3, 2.5 molar equiv.

i

Reaction was incomplete after 30 h.