Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 12;2:40. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-40.v1

Table 1. Effect sizes of mobile phone radiation on sperm quality traits.

Sample size Hedges’s g p-value
In vivo studies
Semen volume 591 0.09774 0.29458
Sperm concentration 874 -0.66388 0.01858
Sperm morphology 746 -1.28325 0.00000
Sperm motility 1079 -0.81584 0.00102
Proportion of non-progressive motile sperm (%) 283 -0.16136 0.03396
Proportion of rapid progressive motile sperm (%) 283 -0.25708 0.09969
Proportion of slow progressive motile sperm (%) 283 -0.39031 0.00765
Liquefaction time (min) 321 -0.11449 0.28277
pH 321 -0.36681 0.05592
Sperm viability (%) 321 -1.13150 0.00220
Semen viscosity 321 -0.00924 0.93083
In vitro studies
Acrosome reaction (%) 24 -1.69939 0.00000
Sperm area (µm 2) 24 -6.79952 0.00004
Average path velocity 20 -8.16777 0.00000
Curvilinear velocity 20 -10.37987 0.00000
DNA fragmentation 32 0.10182 0.68034
Fast progressive motility 49 -0.50794 0.01195
Hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) 20 1.721867 0.000002
Major axis (µm) 24 -3.62708 0.01918
Minor axis (µm) 24 -7.4825 0.0361
Sperm motility 105 -2.82739 0.00118
Non motile spermatozoa 49 -0.61615 0.03275
Non progressive motility 49 0.04371 0.82612
Perimeter (µm) 24 -5.53132 0.01897
Progressive motility 12 -0.04606 0.90700
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) 36 -11.37087 0.33592
Slow progressive motility 49 -0.14543 0.67535
Sperm concentration 59 -0.02309 0.89887
Sperm zona binding 10 -0.68402 0.12153
Straight line velocity 20 -6.37614 0.00000
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) 32 -0.25102 0.31138
Viability (%) 56 -2.75116 0.02543