Table 1. Effect sizes of mobile phone radiation on sperm quality traits.
Sample size | Hedges’s g | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|
In vivo studies | |||
Semen volume | 591 | 0.09774 | 0.29458 |
Sperm concentration | 874 | -0.66388 | 0.01858 |
Sperm morphology | 746 | -1.28325 | 0.00000 |
Sperm motility | 1079 | -0.81584 | 0.00102 |
Proportion of non-progressive motile sperm (%) | 283 | -0.16136 | 0.03396 |
Proportion of rapid progressive motile sperm (%) | 283 | -0.25708 | 0.09969 |
Proportion of slow progressive motile sperm (%) | 283 | -0.39031 | 0.00765 |
Liquefaction time (min) | 321 | -0.11449 | 0.28277 |
pH | 321 | -0.36681 | 0.05592 |
Sperm viability (%) | 321 | -1.13150 | 0.00220 |
Semen viscosity | 321 | -0.00924 | 0.93083 |
In vitro studies | |||
Acrosome reaction (%) | 24 | -1.69939 | 0.00000 |
Sperm area (µm 2) | 24 | -6.79952 | 0.00004 |
Average path velocity | 20 | -8.16777 | 0.00000 |
Curvilinear velocity | 20 | -10.37987 | 0.00000 |
DNA fragmentation | 32 | 0.10182 | 0.68034 |
Fast progressive motility | 49 | -0.50794 | 0.01195 |
Hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) | 20 | 1.721867 | 0.000002 |
Major axis (µm) | 24 | -3.62708 | 0.01918 |
Minor axis (µm) | 24 | -7.4825 | 0.0361 |
Sperm motility | 105 | -2.82739 | 0.00118 |
Non motile spermatozoa | 49 | -0.61615 | 0.03275 |
Non progressive motility | 49 | 0.04371 | 0.82612 |
Perimeter (µm) | 24 | -5.53132 | 0.01897 |
Progressive motility | 12 | -0.04606 | 0.90700 |
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) | 36 | -11.37087 | 0.33592 |
Slow progressive motility | 49 | -0.14543 | 0.67535 |
Sperm concentration | 59 | -0.02309 | 0.89887 |
Sperm zona binding | 10 | -0.68402 | 0.12153 |
Straight line velocity | 20 | -6.37614 | 0.00000 |
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) | 32 | -0.25102 | 0.31138 |
Viability (%) | 56 | -2.75116 | 0.02543 |