Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 5;88(6):1070–1078. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0623

Table 3.

Summary results of multivariable logistic regression analysis for pupae of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus during 2009 and 2010*

Risk factor Aedes aegypti (2010) Ae. albopictus (2009) Ae. albopictus (2010)
No. Adjusted Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P No. Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P No. Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) P
Degree of urbanization (2010) 676 1.04 (1.02–1.06) < 0.001 2,428 0.96 (0.94–0.98) < 0.001
Type of water container 676 1,099 2,428
Bucket 174 1.00 296 1.00 653 1.00
Drum 46 2.26 (0.54–9.45) 0.263 161 0.40 (0.04–3.60) 0.414 325 3.05 (1.35–6.89) 0.007
Tire 60 2.99 (1.01–8.86) 0.049 141 10.87 (3.60–32.88) < 0.001 296 3.45 (1.63–7.31) 0.001
Pot or bowl 94 0.32 (0.03–3.14) 0.328 96 1.67 (0.31–9.12) 0.552 362 1.61 (0.67–3.85) 0.288
Jar 202 4.72 (2.05–10.89) < 0.001 137 3.04 (0.81–11.46) 0.100 451 6.59 (3.25–13.35) < 0.001
Other 100 3.30 (0.96–11.40) 0.059 268 4.03 (1.40–11.56) 0.01 341 2.34 (1.10–5.01) 0.028
Container function (2010) 2,428
Water storage 296 1.00
Hygiene/cooking/drinking 1,438 0.20 (0.10–0.39) < 0.001
Discarded waste 496 3.64 (1.84–7.17) < 0.001
Other 198 1.38 (0.67–2.87) 0.384
Cover 676 2,428
No 545 1.00 2,074 1.00
Yes 131 0.19 (0.06–0.63) 0.006 354 0.25 (0.08–0.74) 0.013
How full (%) 1,099 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.020 2,428 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.198
*

No. is the number of containers sampled at each exposure level. Significant associations are show in bold.