Table 5.
Comparison of linear and negative binomial regression analysis of larval abundance for all data points and significant principal components*
Species | PC | Lin. regression | Neg. binomial | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient | AIC | Coefficient | AIC | ||
An. janconnae | 2 | −0.99† | 426.37 | −0.75 | 164.67 |
5 | 0.31 | 435.39 | 0.52‡ | 177.39 | |
An. goeldii | 1 | 0.43 | 417.83 | 0.64† | 187.98 |
4 | 0.33 | 419.33 | 0.48§ | 193.48 | |
An. triannulatus | 3 | −0.29 | 330.53 | −0.48§ | 187.19 |
An. oryzalimnetes | 1 | 0.22§ | 256.93 | 0.60† | 108.51 |
3 | −0.16 | 259.63 | −0.79§ | 109.5 | |
An. marajoara | 3 | −0.68‡ | 435.91 | −1.63† | 148.54 |
Significance:
P ≤ 0.05;
P ≤ 0.01;
P ≤ 0.001. Akaike information criterion (AIC), a measure of the relative goodness of fit of a statistical model, is included, with the preferred model (bold) having the minimum AIC value.