Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013 Apr;83(2):413–421. doi: 10.1111/ajop.12016

Table 3.

Summary of Regression Analyses Predicting Children’s PTSS at T2

Step 1 Step 2

B B 95% CI B β 95% CI
Posttraumatic stress symptoms T1 a 0.29 .37** 0.09, 0.50 0.13 0 .16 −0.84, 0.34
Caregiver education −2.32 −.35** −4.03, −0.61 −1.96 − 0.30* −3.54, 0.37
Caregiver-child conflict T1b -- -- -- 7.19 0.34** 2.20, 12.17
Parental coping advice - avoidance T1 c -- -- -- 3.13 0.23 −0.30, 6.60

Note. N = 47.

a

Child reported;

b

Scale ranged from 1 (never) to 4 (almost every day);

c

Scale ranged from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most of the time). The following variables were tested for inclusion in this model: child demographic characteristics (i.e., gender and ethnic background), child hurricane exposure, caregiver characteristics (i.e., employment status), caregivers’ distress and PTSS, perceived caregiver distress (i.e., too upset to talk, unavailability), perceived parental warmth, and coping advice (i.e., self-distraction, active coping, and denial). Nonsignificant variables (p > .05) were not included in the final model. Model 1 Adjusted R2 = .32, p <.001; Model 2 Adjusted R2 = .48, p < .01.

p = .06.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.