Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 27.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2008 Nov 18;27(4):565–572. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.081

Table 2. Correlations of BM assay results with peak serologic responsesa.

Day 0
Day 28
ρc pc ρc pc
LPS (n = 8)b
 SFC/106 expanded cells 0.51 0.2 0.95 0.0003
 SFC/total IgG+ 0.55 0.2 0.95 0.0003
 SFC/CD19+ 0.52 0.2 0.90 0.002
 SFC/CD19+ CD27+ 0.55 0.2 0.90 0.002
 SFC/CD19+ CD27+ IgG+ 0.55 0.2 0.93 0.001
IpaB (n = 5)b
 SFC/106 expanded cells 0.67 0.2 0.67 0.2
 SFC/total IgG+ 0.67 0.2 0.8 0.1
 SFC/CD19+ 0.67 0.2 0.8 0.1
 SFC/CD19+ CD27+ 0.67 0.2 0.8 0.1
 SFC/CD19+ CD27+ IgG+ 0.67 0.2 0.8 0.1

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are bolded.

a

Only recipients of CVD 1204 and CVD 1208 who mounted a fourfold or higher rise of anti-LPS IgG pre- to post-vaccination and had evidence of appropriate BM expansion in vitro were included in this analysis. In these volunteers anti-LPS and anti-IpaB SFC were adjusted for defined B subpopulations and correlated with the corresponding peak antigen-specific serological response before and after immunization.

b

Flow cytometry data available for 8/9 LPS seroresponders and 5/7 IpaB seroresponders.

c

Determined by Spearman ρ comparing BM response to peak serum titer.