Table 2. Correlations of BM assay results with peak serologic responsesa.
Day 0
|
Day 28
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
ρc | pc | ρc | pc | |
LPS (n = 8)b | ||||
SFC/106 expanded cells | 0.51 | 0.2 | 0.95 | 0.0003 |
SFC/total IgG+ | 0.55 | 0.2 | 0.95 | 0.0003 |
SFC/CD19+ | 0.52 | 0.2 | 0.90 | 0.002 |
SFC/CD19+ CD27+ | 0.55 | 0.2 | 0.90 | 0.002 |
SFC/CD19+ CD27+ IgG+ | 0.55 | 0.2 | 0.93 | 0.001 |
IpaB (n = 5)b | ||||
SFC/106 expanded cells | 0.67 | 0.2 | 0.67 | 0.2 |
SFC/total IgG+ | 0.67 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
SFC/CD19+ | 0.67 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
SFC/CD19+ CD27+ | 0.67 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
SFC/CD19+ CD27+ IgG+ | 0.67 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are bolded.
Only recipients of CVD 1204 and CVD 1208 who mounted a fourfold or higher rise of anti-LPS IgG pre- to post-vaccination and had evidence of appropriate BM expansion in vitro were included in this analysis. In these volunteers anti-LPS and anti-IpaB SFC were adjusted for defined B subpopulations and correlated with the corresponding peak antigen-specific serological response before and after immunization.
Flow cytometry data available for 8/9 LPS seroresponders and 5/7 IpaB seroresponders.
Determined by Spearman ρ comparing BM response to peak serum titer.