Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;87(17):9473–9485. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00596-13

Table 1.

Detailed comparison of AAV2/8, AAV2/rh32.33, and LM14a

Construct T cell onset T cell kinetics Infiltration Expression
AAV8 Little to none None Little to none Stable
AVrh32.33
    Old method High at day 14 Dramatic increase from days 14–21 Severe Cleared by day 64
    New method High at day 14 Minor increase from days 14–21 or remain the same Moderate to severe Decreased from days 21–48; low levels remain at day 105
LM14 High at day 14 Decrease after day 14 Mild to moderate Slight decrease from days 48–64; moderate levels remain at day 105
a

Mice were i.m. injected with 1011 GCs of AAV2/8, AAV2/rh32.33, or LM14 (AAV2/rh32.33-8_VR.IV) expressing nLacZ. Vectors produced by the old method were produced via 40-plate transfection using CaCl2 and HBS, followed by vector harvest from the cell pellet and cesium gradient purification. In the new method, vectors were produced by PEI-MAX transfection on cell stacks, followed by total lysate harvest and iodixanol gradient purification. AAV8 and LM14 were produced by the new method. Muscles were harvested for histochemistry on days 14, 21, 28, 48, and 105. Infiltration in muscle sections was scored as normal (score, 0), mild (score, 1), moderate (score, 2), or severe (score, 3). T cell assays were performed on days 14, 21, and 28 postinjection.