Table 3.
Comparison of sensitivities and specificities of indirect ELISAs using native and recombinant antigens
| Calculation | Antigen |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | SA | rOmp28 | rOmp31 | |
| Sensitivity (%)a | 68.7 | 71.7 | 91.6 | 62.2 |
| Specificity (%)b | 91.9 | 95.3 | 97.6 | 94.7 |
| Correlation (%) with RBPTc | 84.8 | 88.5 | 92.7 | 85.7 |
| Correlation (%) with STATc | 85.5 | 89.7 | 94.2 | 87.2 |
| Correlation (%) with 2ME testc | 87.8 | 91.9 | 96.2 | 90.4 |
| Likelihood ratio for positive resultd | 8.5 | 15.3 | 38.2 | 11.7 |
| Likelihood ratio for negative resulte | 2.9 | 3.4 | 11.6 | 2.5 |
Sensitivity = [true positives/(true positives + false negatives)] × 100.
Specificity = [true negatives/(true negatives + false positives)] × 100.
Correlation = [(number of samples positive by both tests + number of samples negative by both tests)/total number of samples] × 100.
Likelihood ratio for positive result = sensitivity/1 − specificity.
Likelihood ratio for negative result = specificity/1 − sensitivity.