Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;51(9):3117–3122. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00920-13

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of isolates producing CTX-M-type ESBL from mastitic cows

Antimicrobial agenta Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
MIC range (μg/ml) MIC50 (μg/ml) MIC90 (μg/ml) Breakpoint (μg/ml; mm)b No. of isolates (%)
MIC range (μg/ml) No. of resistant isolates (%) (B)h MIC range (μg/ml) No. of resistant isolates (%) (C)h
Susceptible Intermediate Resistant (A)h
Ampicilline >512 >512 >512 ≥32 0 0 49 (100) >512 10 (100) >512 6 (100)
Cefazoline >256 >256 >256 ≥32 0 0 49 (100) >256 10 (100) >256 6 (100)
Cefuroximee >256 >256 >256 ≥32c 0 0 49 (100) >256 10 (100) >256 6 (100)
Ceftazidime ≤2 to 64 ≤2 ≤2 ≥16c 45 (91.8) 3 (6.1) 1 (2.0)**B 16–64 10 (100)**A,C ≤2 0**B
CAZ/CLA ≤0.25 to >8 ≤0.25 0.5 0.5 to >8 ≤0.25 to 0.5
Cefotaxime ≤16 to 256 64 128 ≥4c -g 4 (8.2)g 45 (91.8) 512 to >512 10 (100) 128 to >512 6 (100)
CTX/CLA ≤1 to >8 ≤1 ≤1 ≤1 to 8 ≤1
Cefpodoxime ≤8 to >64 >64 >64 ≥16 1 (2.0) 0 48 (98.0) >64 10 (100) >64 6 (100)
Ceftriaxone 64 to >512 512 >512 ≥4c 0 0 49 (100) >512 10 (100) 512 to >512 6 (100)
Ceftiofure 64 to >512 >512 >512 ≥8 0 0 49 (100) >512 10 (100) >512 6 (100)
Cefquinomee 16 to >128 128 >128 d >128 >128
Cefepime ≤8 to 64 ≤8 ≤8 ≥32c 43 (87.8) 3 (6.1) 3 (6.1)**B,C >64 10 (100)**A ≤8 to >64 4 (66.6)**A
Cefmetazole ≤4 to >32 ≤4 ≤4 ≥64c 47 (95.9) 0 2 (4.1) ≤4 to 32 0 ≤4 to >32 1 (16.6)
Moxalactam ≤8 to >32 ≤8 ≤8 ≥64c 48 (98.0) 0 1 (2.0) ≤8 0 ≤8 0
Imipenem ≤1 ≤1 ≤1 ≥16 49 (100) 0 0 ≤1 0 ≤1 0
Meropenem ≤2 to 4 ≤2 ≤2 ≥4c 48 (98.0) 0 1 (2) ≤2 0 ≤2 0
Aztreonam ≤8 to >64 ≤8 16 ≥16c g 43 (87.8)g 6 (12.2)**B, *C 64 to >64 10 (100)**A,*C ≤8 to 32 3 (50)*A,B
Gentamicine ≤2 to >16 ≤2 ≤2 ≥16 46 (93.9) d 3 (6.1) ≤2 to >16 1 (10.0) ≤2 0
Amikacin ≤4 to >16 ≤4 ≤4 ≥64 48 (98.0) 1 (2.0)g ≤4 to 8 0 ≤4 0
OTETe ≤4 to >16 ≤4 >16 ≥16 24 (49.0) 11 (22.4) 14 (28.6)*B ≤4 to >16 7 (70.0)*A ≥16 6 (100)
SXTe ≤0.5/9.5 to >4/76 ≤0.5/9.5 4/76 ≥4/76 42 (85.7) d 7 (14.3)**B,*C 4/76 to >4/76 7 (70.0)**A ≤0.5/9.5 to >4/76 3 (50)*A
Enrofloxacine ≤0.25 to 2 ≤0.25 2 ≥2 45 (91.8) 2 (4.1) 2 (4.1) ≤0.25 to >2 1 (10.0) ≤0.25 to 0.5 0
Ciprofloxacin ≤0.5 to 2 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≥4c 46 (93.9) 3 (6.1) 0*B ≤0.5 to >2 1 (10.0)*A ≤0.5 to 1 0
Cefoxitinf ≤14 mmc 48 (98.0) 1 (2.0) 0*B,**C S to R 1 (10.0)*A S to R 1 (16.6)**A
Kanamycine,f ≤13 mm 38 (77.6) 1 (2.0) 10 (20.4)*B, C S to R 5(50.0)*A S to R 4 (66.6)*A
CHLf ≤13 mm 41 (83.7) 0 8 (16.3) S to R 4 (40.0) S to R 3 (50)
Levofloxacinf ≤13 mmc 49 (100) 0 0*B S to R 1(10.0)*A S 0
a

Assessed by the broth microdilution or disk diffusion method for 41 K. pneumoniae and 6 K. oxytoca isolates producing CTX-M-2 and 2 K. pneumoniae isolates producing CTX-M-14 (group 1), 10 E. coli isolates producing CTX-M-15 (group 2), and other Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing CTX-M-2 or CTX-M-14 (group 3; CTX-M-2: E. coli, n = 1; C. koseri, n = 2; E. aerogenes, n = 1; E. coli, CTX-M-14, n = 2). Abbreviations: CAZ/CLA, ceftazidime/clavlanic acid; CTX, cefotaxime; OTET, oxytetracycline; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazol; CHL, chloramphenicol.

b

Breakpoint for resistance in accordance with CLSI document M31-A3 (2008) (15) for veterinary pathogens.

c

Breakpoint for resistance in accordance with CLSI document M100-S21 (2011) (20) for isolates from human infections with Enterobacteriaceae.

d

Breakpoint for resistance or intermediate is not defined in CLSI documents M31-A3 (2008) (15) and M100-S21 (2011) (20).

e

Antimicrobial agent approved for cattle in Japan; the other 17 antimicrobials in this table are unapproved for cattle.

f

Susceptibilities were tested by disc diffusion method according to CLSI documents M31-A3 (2008) (15) and M100-S21 (2011) (20).

g

Isolates in the susceptible, intermediate, and resistant categories could not be differentiated.

h

Significant differences were determined by the χ2 test for comparison with the group indicated by the capital letter (A, B, or C): *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.