Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;51(9):2921–2925. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00683-13

Table 4.

Performance of microscopy methods compared to that of solid culture in HIV-infected and -uninfected patient groups for 432 patients, considering positivity of the first and second specimens

Microscopy methoda Microscopy results (% [95% CI]) for:
HIV-positive patients (n = 261) HIV-negative patients (n = 171) Total (n = 432)
Centrifugation
    Sensitivity 46.9 (32.5–61.7) 57.1 (39.4–73.7) 51.2 (40.0–62.3)
    Specificity 99.1 (96.6–99.9) 99.3 (96.0–99.9) 99.1 (97.5–99.8)
    PPV 92 (73.9–98.8) 95.2 (76.1–99.2) 93.5 (82.1–98.6)
    NPV 89.0 (84.3–92.7) 90.0 (84.0–94.3) 89.4 (85.9–92.3)
Centrifugation with NALC
    Sensitivity 49.0 (34.4–63.7) 62.9 (44.9–78.5) 54.8 (43.5–65.7)
    Specificity 98.6 (95.9–99.7) 99.3 (96.0–99.9) 98.9 (97.1–99.7)
    PPV 88.9 (70.8–97.5) 95.7 (78.0–99.3) 92.0 (80.8–97.7)
    NPV 89.3 (84.6–93.0) 91.2 (85.5–95.2) 90.1 (86.6–92.9)
SMF
    Sensitivity 57.1 (42.2–71.2) 74.3 (56.7–87.5) 64.3 (53.1–74.5)
    Specificity 98.6 (95.9–99.7) 94.9 (89.7–97.9) 97.1 (94.8–98.6)
    PPV 90.3 (74.2–97.9) 78.8 (61.1–91.0) 84.4 (73.1–92.2)
    NPV 90.9 (86.38–94.3) 93.5 (88.0–97.0) 91.9 (88.6–94.4)
a

CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.