Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 22.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Biol. 2013 Jul 25;20(8):991–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.06.011

Table 1.

Data collection and refinement statistics.

Data collection
Data set name Unliganded AcePrx-1 Δ171/conA complex
Space group P2 1 C2
Cell dimensions
    a, b, c (Å) 64.7, 146.3, 136.0 141.6, 141.7, 68.9
    β (°) 95.2 98.5
Resolution (Å)a 50.0-2.11 (2.15 - 2.11) 50.0-3.00 (3.11-3.00)
Rmergea,b (%) 6.3 (64.3) 7.9 (33.1)
I / σIa 20.6 (2.0) 13.0 (1.8)
Completeness (%)a 99.7 (95.5) 74.2 (15.0)f
Redundancya 4.0 (3.6) 3.6 (1.4)
Refinement and model quality
Resolution range (Å) 50.0-2.11 50.0-3.00
No. reflections (working set) 129,561 18,894
No. reflections (test set) 7,228 994
Rwork / Rfreec 19.5 / 21.4 18.6 / 20.0
No. atoms
    Protein 13,404 6761
    Water 605 15
    Ligand 0 27
Average B-factors (residual after TLS refinementd)
    Protein (Å2) 29.7 89.6
    Water (Å2) 29.6 94.6
    Ligand (Å2) N/A 90.0
RMSe deviations from ideal values
    Bond lengths (Å) 0.005 0.005
    Bond angles (°) 0.95 0.96
Ramachandran plot 97.8 97.5
    Favored regions (%) 2.2 2.5
    Outliers (%) 0.0 0.0
a

Highest resolution shell is shown in parentheses

b

Rmerge = ΣhklΣi |Ihkl,i – < I>hkl| / ΣhklΣi|Ihkl,i|, where Ihkl is the intensity of a reflection and <I>hkl is the average of all observations of the reflection

c

Rfree, Rwork with 5% of Fobs sequestered before refinement

d

See PDB entries for TLS refinement parameters

e

RMS, root mean square

f

The data was >96% complete in each resolution shell up to 3.5 Å.